Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Children's Literature Definition

Part one:

Children's Literature Defined

                Children’s Literature can simply be defined as written works intended for children. However, from what I learned in this class, children’s literature goes far beyond this very simple definition. It encompasses a variety of literary works, from novels to short stories to poetry, and can be virtually any genre, such as fantasy, non-fiction, or fairy tales. Children’s literature has one quality that defines it from adult literature – the content, including themes, conflicts, characters, plots, settings, and point of view, must be relatable to a child.

            In our early notes, we learned children’s literature has a child protagonist who is faced with issues that concern children. Again, the story must relate to children. The storyline and timeline is usually straightforward, and many times illustrations are used to enhance the reading. Most children’s authors use concrete and vivid language, and the stories typically expand a child’s awareness. Also according to our notes, a “good” children’s book contains the following elements: enjoyable reading without too much teaching or moralizing, truth, quality, integrity, and originality.

            All of the books we read had varying themes. Bud, Not Buddy and Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry dealt with racism. Kira-Kira and Ramona and Her Father taught family values. We also covered topics like bravery (Despereaux), morality (Little Red Riding Hood), and cultural differences (Dragonwings). Throughout the semester, I found two themes to be recurrent in every story we read. The first is the theme of growing up. In every story, we followed a character through a turning point in their life. They were faced with a conflict that leads them to learn, grow, and change. The second common theme was forcing us to see things from a different perspective. In Walk Two Moons, Sal is given “the chance to walk in [her] mother’s moccasins – to see what she had seen and feel what she might have felt” (276). These two themes are constant in children’s literature because it helps children learn, and prepares them to face the world.

            I realized through my experiences in this course that children’s literature is a far greater literary genre than I previously thought. I always thought of it as its own genre, but now I can see how many sub-genres are included in Children’s Literature. The themes are of course relatable to children, but many of the stories we read were very personal for me as well. They are timeless, and each of the stories affected me in different ways. Some of them brought about strong emotions, just as the adult novels I read do. I felt angry when T.J. was nearly lynched on his front lawn. There was a sense of fear when I read about the cold-blooded Jack of all trades who was determined to murder an innocent boy.  I felt sadness when Lynn died, and I felt joyful when Despereaux found his place in the world.

            I think Children’s Literature, as a whole, is in fact literary works intended for children, but the complexities covered during this class shows me that there is much, much more to the definition of children’s literature.

Part two:
 Walk Two Moons

            Walk Two Moons is a Newberry Medal winner, and is regarded in Children’s Literature as a certifiable “classic.” It’s the story of a young girl who is on a journey to come to accept her mother’s death and move on with her life.

            To exclude this novel from a school’s curriculum would be absurd. Just because the book is intended for children does not make it “demeaning” to teach adults. The greatest literature should not be defined by the genre, or age group of its intended audience, but the content and themes within the story. This particular novel taught me about acceptance, and that is a lesson one is never too old to learn. Salamanca is not only relatable to children, but to anyone who is on a journey to find themselves. I would argue that this search is never fully complete, therefor everyone can learn something from her journey.

            Secondly, it is often stated that children’s literature has no permanence, that the themes are only concerning what may be popular right now, not in the future. Walk Two Moons encompasses a variety of themes that are withstanding throughout any point in history. Family bonds, dealing with loss, and growing up – when have these issues not been important? The subjects in this book also cover timeless life lessons, like friendship and prejudice. Also, to view things from Sal’s perspective gives readers a unique glimpse into what life must be like for her.

            Finally, many people may believe children’s literature covers trivial topics, things that aren’t important to adults. In this particular novel, in addition to all the things I have previously mentioned, there are many other underlying issues that are very real, and sometimes difficult to hear about. This book is about a child losing a parent – is that trivial? There’s also mentioning of a mother losing a child, a very vivid and haunting description of a still-birth. The issues in this book are far from trivial; in fact, they are deep enough to provoke very strong emotions in its readers, which is not always an easily attainable element in literature.

            Walk Two Moons is a “classic” for a reason. It encompasses so many themes and issues that are relatable to both children and adults. It presents us with a simple, yet poetic story that takes us on a journey with a young girl who has lost her mother. We are faced with the character’s emotions, and we end up feeling her emotions for ourselves, learning her lessons with her, and challenges us to view things in a new way.

           

               

Monday, April 23, 2012

A Letter To My Mother

Hello Mom,

It's me, Salamanca, your daughter. Do you still remember me? That has to be the dumbest question anyone has ever asked. How could you not remember me? I know you do because I surely remember you. I remember you every second of every day. Every single thing I look at, smell, touch, taste, or feel reminds me of you. I miss you, Mom. I know you are searching for something. Yourself, I think. You said that you wanted to find out what you were "really like....before [you were] a wife and a mother..." You want to find out what you are "underneath, where [you are] Chanhassen" (143). I know you probably want everyone to call you that now - Chanhassen, but to me, you're mom, and you always will be.

When are you coming home, Mom? I really feel lost without you. Dad misses you too, I know he does. I see him looking at old albums with your pictures in them. He took me away from home though, so if you do come back to our real home, we won't be there. I think it made him too sad to be in Bybanks, because he thought about you too much. I did too. I want you to come back to us so we move back home and things can be as they were before.

I'm sorry for anything that I did, and I know Dad is sorry too. I don't really believe we could have done anything to make you stay, but if there was anything, I would have done it. Anything. I miss you so much. I miss seeing your pretty smile, and I miss seeing you and Dad hugging and kissing each other. I is picking blackberries with you, and listening to your songs. I don't even know if this will matter to you anymore, but I have to tell you these things.

Mom, have you ever heard the story of Pandora and her box? Did you know that when she opened that box, all of the terrible things in the world were set free. But, do you know what stayed in the box? Hope, Mom. Hope stayed in the box. I have hope, do you? I have faith that you'll come back to me one day, and we will live just as we did before. I can't go on without holding onto my hope. I can't bear the reality that you'll never come back.

Since I started writing this letter, we have returned home, so I feel better now. I feel better because now that I have accepted the truth of the situation, as horrible as it is, I know that you are here. Although, I believe in my heart that no matter where I go, you'll be there. And when I thought I couldn't go on without you, I think I was right. But since now I believe you're always with me, it's okay to feel that way. I know you will not leave again, Mom.

Seeing your grave was proof to me that you will not return to me the way that I had always hoped for. I don't blame you, and I'm not angry with you, Mom. I love you so much and of course, I still miss you. But now I realize that you did come back. When the trees sway n the wind, and I hear a birdsong, I know that's you, Mom. The faith and hope inside me tells me that it's you, and with those little signs, you came back to me. Maybe I can't see you, but I can feel you. I can feel you all around me, Mom. Everyday.

Love,
Your Salamanca Tree

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Monster Trivia

Q: What type of being is associated with grave robbing and eating corpses?

A: Ghoul.



A Ghoul is thought to be a despicable creature who robs graves and feeds off the corpses. Ghouls are a part of ancient Arabic folklore, and it's thought that this is where they were first mentioned. Ghouls are the lowest of the low when referring to the spiritual world. In The Graveyard Book, ghouls are described as "...parasites and scavengers, eaters of carrion" (82). It is also thought that ancient ghouls are the inspiration to today's zombies - both have to eat other beings to survive.

Q: According to The Graveyard Book, what creatures "have hairless wings, and they fly low and fast. They do not visit this world, but they fly the red skies above the road to Ghulheim" (72)?

A: Night-Gaunts



Nightgaunts seem to be good creatures in The Graveyard Book; they help to rescue Bod from the evil ghouls (93). Doing some research on Nightgaunts, I found that they are not always portrayed this way. When they appear in H.P. Lovecraft's Dreamcycle, they are quite terrifying. Lovecraft has said that the nighgaunt was inspired by his childhood nightmares.

Q: Which monster got it's characteristic traits from a famous book written in 1897?

A: The vampire.



Dracula was written by Bram Stroker in 1897. While there were previous myths about creatures that could have been considered vampires, Stroker brought all of the characteristics we now associate with vampires together and created an image of the classic vampire. He is seduces his victims before drinking their blood; he is immortal, but has weaknesses like garlic and crucifixes; he can transform into a bat or sometimes a wolf; and of course, they have fangs that they use to feed on the blood of the living.

Q: What is the general term for a supernatural entity that supposedly possesses energy, yet don't have any material substance?

A: Ghost.



The existence of ghosts has not been proven by science, yet many people still believe in them. Some people think ghosts can be harmful, while others believe they are simply trying to communicate with the living world. They are believed to posses energy, yet they have no physical body. Ghosts are thought to be able to possess humans, and use their bodies as sort of vehicles to communicate. Ghosts are also thought to be responsible for haunting. In The Graveyard Book, we can observe lots of classic traits of ghosts, but the most obvious is that they cannot be seen by most humans.

Q: What is the term for a specific type of spirit that interferes with the human world in malicious and haunting ways?

A: Poltergeist.



A poltergeist is a spirit thought to interact with the human world with the intention of scaring and haunting people. They typically can move objects, make noises, and sometimes even hurt people. Poltergeists are also very ancient creatures, most likely appearing in early myths and legends about demons. There is a a case that supposedly proves poltergeists exist that occurred in England in the 1970s. (I think that is what the movie is based on). A scientist named Vladistav Bukreev claimed to have documented severe poltergeist activity in the home of an English family. He reports broken windows, flying bricks, injuries to the children, and floating objects. The film Poltergeist (1982) is a good example of what is believed about poltergeists.

Q: How was Liza Hempstock (and many other "witches") killed?

A: Drowning.



Liza Hempstock was executed in a way that countless other people accused of witchcraft were during the witch hunts at different points in history. She was dragged from her home because someone accused her of witchcraft, and then put on trial. She was strapped to a stool and forced beneath the water where she eventually "got a lung full of water" and died (110). This was a classic way for the accusers to see if the accused were guilty or not. If the "witch" did not drown, he/she was confirmed as a witch. This is because of their magic and their immunity too baptism (and water, apparently). However, an innocent person would simply drown - thus proving their innocence. Of course, by that time it would be too late to do anything to save them.

Q: What monster is known in The Graveyard Book as the "Hounds of God" and who is a Hound of God in the novel?

A: Werewolves & Miss Lupescu



"Those that men call Werewolves or Lycanthropes call themselves The Hounds of God, as they claim their transformation is a gift from their creator, and they repay the gift with their tenacity, for they will pursue an evildoer to the very gates of Hell" (97). In this book, werewolves are good creatures who protect others and take revenge on evil spirits or people. However, in popular culture, werewolves are evil creatures who will surely eat you if you ever encounter one. They transform from human to werewolf because of a full moon, and they roam the night ravaging people, and sometimes even graves. In Gaiman's story, however, the Hounds of God seem to be the most noble and protective creatures in the supernatural world.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ghoul
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightgaunt
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/strange-creatures/vampire.htm
http://www.scientificpsychic.com/esp/ghosts-spirits.html
http://www.trueghosttales.com/poltergeist.php
http://www.yourdiscovery.com/best_of/true_horror/witches/index.shtml
http://alam25.tripod.com/index.htm

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

A Child's Crusade


This is a war that must be fought.

Although I may die,

Or worse – get caught,

I must continue to fight.



Our adventure will be trying,

But we shall be brave.

For even through dying,

Our souls will be saved.



Our courage never wanes,

Even though, we are small.

We’ll fight through our pain,

And conquer them all!



In the face of death,

We will cry not.

We will strive ‘til our last breath.

This is a war that must be fought.


Friday, April 6, 2012

Brenda Swamp

Brenda

Brenda was a happy little girl. She loved to play around the swamp, even though sometimes it was scary. Her parents always told her not to go there because an alligator could swallow her up. Since she had never seen an alligator, she thought that was ridiculous. It smelled funny in the swamp, but she kind of liked it. She sometimes pretended she was a pirate or a swamp creature. She'd make silly growling noises and raise her arms above her head and curl her fingers. She thought she must be the scariest swamp creature that ever lived.


Brenda turned 10 in the summer, and she thought now that her age was in double digits, she was big enough to go to the swamp at night. She still knew that her parents would not be happy about this, so she lied and said she was going to the big hill to look at the stars. She started growling and lurching along, as she usually did. Then, she heard something growl back. First, she was terrified, but then she convinced herself she was just hearing things. But, the convincing wasn't going so well, so she decided it was time to go home.


She began to gather her things, and started to climb out of the smelly swamp. Just as she was reaching up to grab hold of a tree branch for some leverage, she felt something grab her ankle. It was the swamp creature! She didn't have time to even look at what it was, and she let out a single scream before she was pulled down into the swampy waters. Her last memory was of her mom and dad. She should have listened to them.


The swamp was named for her, "Brenda Swamp," and if you ever pass by it at night you might see Brenda. "Her ghost lived in the swamp. It was looking for her parents" (87). Her mom and dad figured out where she died, but they never found her body. So Brenda's spirit will spend eternity searching for them.


This is why you must always listen to your parents and older sister, because we know where the dangers are. And anytime you think you know better, and that you don't have to listen, just remember that poor girl, Brenda. Can you imagine what it must feel like to be stuck in a swamp forever, searching, but never finding your mom and dad?




Thursday, March 22, 2012

Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry

If I were to produce a musical based on this book, these would be some of my choices for...

Songs:
"Strange Fruit" by Billie Holiday http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4ZyuULy9zs
 I'd choose this song because it talks about the lynching in the racist south. I could imagine this song being played when they talk about the night men.
 "A Change is Gonna Come" by Sam Cooke   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbO2_077ixs
I chose this song because it highlights the struggles of the black race during the first half of the 1900s. I would use this song because the characters in this story are on this journey that Cooke is talking about in his song. I'd probably close out my show with this song, because it is so powerful and leaves a feeling of triumph.
"Imagine" by John Lennon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLgYAHHkPFs&feature=related
This is one of my favorite songs of all time. This song is more about war than being about outright racsim as the other two are, but I think the war against racism can definitely relate to this song. I would use this song as the opening song - to get people's attention and bring their emotions out.

Actors/Actresses:
Cassie - Willow Smith
 Stacey - Leon Thomas III
Little Man - Jaden Smith
T.J. - Carlos Knight
Mama - Angela Basset
Papa - Denzel Washington
Big Ma - Eartha Kitt (read her bio, that's why I chose her)
Mr. Morrison - Michael Clarke Duncan
Granger - Dan Aykroyd
Hammer - Morgan Freeman (why not, right?)

Stage Design:
I would want my stage to look like a plantation from the old south, with desolate roads and lots of cotton fields in the background.



Thursday, March 15, 2012

Bud, Not Buddy


Bud, Not Buddy

How to Move Past  “I liked it vs I Didn’t Like It” Reactions by Richard Peck

1.       What would the story be like if the main character were of the opposite sex?

I think it’s very important to the story that Bud is a young boy, especially considering the time period of the story. He is growing up and becoming a man, which is a lot different and perhaps more complicated than becoming a woman. Because Bud is a male character certain personality traits become more important than they would be if it was a girl. For example, Bud has to be brave and knowledgeable about the world. Even though he’s obviously still a child, as evident by him believing in vampires and other things, he overcomes his fears when tries to kill what he thinks is a vampire bat in his foster family’s shed (27). He also shows some protective characteristics early on when he comforts the other, younger boy at the orphanage. I think the journey Bud goes on is symbolic of his journey into manhood. Even when he ends up crying finally, and thinking he must look like a baby, he is really growing up and becoming a stronger, well-rounded individual.

2.       Why is the story set where it is? (Not what is the setting.)

The story is set in Michigan during the Great Depression.  We learn early on in the story about the setting. On page 2, the social worker says to Bud and his housemate, “I know you don’t understand what it means, but there’s a depression going on all over this country.” (I happen to think Bud understood a lot more than he was given credit for). To go along with my first answer, I think the setting is extremely important to the development and theme of the story. Bud would probably not be in the situation he was in if it weren’t during the Depression, so this is an essential piece of the story. Becoming a man is hard enough, but to complicate that journey with the hard times people faced during the 1930s, and you’ve got a story that is very hard to put down

I also think the place is equally as important as the time the story takes place in. Flint, Michigan was an industrial city around this time, and a lot of people lost their jobs. These people had nothing after the Depression hit them; they were without a means to provide any type of support for their families. I thought this was important because in places like Minnesota for example, a lot of people had their own farms so they could, at the very least, grow their own food. In industrialized cities, such as Flint, times were even harder during the 1930s because most of the people there were, simply put, SOL.